4.7 Article

A pictorial account of the human embryonic heart between 3.5 and 8 weeks of development

期刊

COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY
卷 5, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s42003-022-03153-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Stichting Rijp

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides detailed reconstructions of human cardiac development using 3D-reconstruction and remodeling software, describing the developmental appearance and subsequent remodeling of 70 different structures. The resource offers interactive 3D anatomical models and quantifies developmental milestones, contributing to the understanding of key structures in cardiac function.
Heart development is topographically complex and requires visualization to understand its progression. No comprehensive 3-dimensional primer of human cardiac development is currently available. We prepared detailed reconstructions of 12 hearts between 3.5 and 8 weeks post fertilization, using Amira (R) 3D-reconstruction and Cinema4D (R)-remodeling software. The models were visualized as calibrated interactive 3D-PDFs. We describe the developmental appearance and subsequent remodeling of 70 different structures incrementally, using sequential segmental analysis. Pictorial timelines of structures highlight age-dependent events, while graphs visualize growth and spiraling of the wall of the heart tube. The basic cardiac layout is established between 3.5 and 4.5 weeks. Septation at the venous pole is completed at 6 weeks. Between 5.5 and 6.5 weeks, as the outflow tract becomes incorporated in the ventricles, the spiraling course of its subaortic and subpulmonary channels is transferred to the intrapericardial arterial trunks. The remodeling of the interventricular foramen is complete at 7 weeks. Hikspoors et al. generate a pictorial account of human embryonic heart development between 3.5 and 8 weeks. This resource provides detailed, interactive 3D anatomical models and quantifies the developmental milestones of key structures in cardiac function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据