4.6 Article

A Protein-Based, Long-Acting HIV-1 Fusion Inhibitor with an Improved Pharmacokinetic Profile

期刊

PHARMACEUTICALS
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ph15040424

关键词

HIV-1; gp41; fusion inhibitor; human serum albumin; long-acting inhibitor

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [92169112, 81971944]
  2. Program of Shanghai Academic/Technology Research Leader [20XD1420300]
  3. CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences [2021-I2M-1-037]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A protein-based, long-acting HIV fusion inhibitor called FLT was designed and constructed, which binds with human serum albumin in a reversible manner to prolong the half-life of the HIV fusion inhibitor T1144. FLT showed high efficiency in inhibiting HIV infection and is considered a promising candidate for a new protein-based anti-HIV drug.
Recently, a series of highly effective peptide- or protein-based HIV fusion inhibitors have been identified. However, due to their short half-life, their clinical application is limited. Therefore, the development of long-acting HIV fusion inhibitors is urgently needed. Here, we designed and constructed a protein-based, long-acting HIV fusion inhibitor, termed FLT (FN3-L35-T1144), consisting of a monobody, FN3, which contains an albumin-binding domain (ABD), a 35-mer linker (L35), and a peptide-based HIV fusion inhibitor, T1144. We found that FLT bound, via its FN3 component, with human serum albumin (HSA) in a reversible manner, thus maintaining the high efficiency of T1144 against infection by both HIV-1 IIIB (X4) and Bal (R5) strains with IC50 of 11.6 nM and 15.3 nM, respectively, and remarkably prolonging the half-life of T1144 (similar to 27 h in SD rats). This approach affords protein-based HIV fusion inhibitors with much longer halflife compared to enfuvirtide, a peptide-based HIV fusion inhibitor approved for use in clinics. Therefore, FLT is a promising candidate as a new protein-based anti-HIV drug with an improved pharmacokinetic profile.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据