4.6 Article

Antiviral Activity of Repurposing Ivermectin against a Panel of 30 Clinical SARS-CoV-2 Strains Belonging to 14 Variants

期刊

PHARMACEUTICALS
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ph15040445

关键词

COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; in vitro; ivermectin; remdesivir; chloroquine; repurposing drug; omicron

资金

  1. French National Research Agency Investissement d'avenir programme [ANR-10-IAHU-03]
  2. Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire (IHU) Mediterranee Infection [COVID-19]
  3. L'Occitane Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the past two years, various variants of SARS-CoV-2 have posed challenges globally, with the drug ivermectin demonstrating relatively consistent in vitro activity against the virus. However, caution must be exercised in translating these results into clinical treatment for SARS-CoV-2-infected patients.
Over the past two years, several variants of SARS-CoV-2 have emerged and spread all over the world. However, infectivity, clinical severity, re-infection, virulence, transmissibility, vaccine responses and escape, and epidemiological aspects have differed between SARS-CoV-2 variants. Currently, very few treatments are recommended against SARS-CoV-2. Identification of effective drugs among repurposing FDA-approved drugs is a rapid, efficient and low-cost strategy against SARS-CoV-2. One of those drugs is ivermectin. Ivermectin is an antihelminthic agent that previously showed in vitro effects against a SARS-CoV-2 isolate (Australia/VI01/2020 isolate) with an IC50 of around 2 mu M. We evaluated the in vitro activity of ivermectin on Vero E6 cells infected with 30 clinically isolated SARS-CoV-2 strains belonging to 14 different variants, and particularly 17 strains belonging to six variants of concern (VOC) (variants related to Wuhan, alpha, beta, gamma, delta and omicron). The in vitro activity of ivermectin was compared to those of chloroquine and remdesivir. Unlike chloroquine (EC50 from 4.3 +/- 2.5 to 29.3 +/- 5.2 mu M) or remdesivir (EC50 from 0.4 +/- 0.3 to 25.2 +/- 9.4 mu M), ivermectin showed a relatively homogeneous in vitro activity against SARS-CoV-2 regardless of the strains or variants (EC50 from 5.1 +/- 0.5 to 6.7 +/- 0.4 mu M), except for one omicron strain (EC50 = 1.3 +/- 0.5 mu M). Ivermectin (No. EC50 = 219, mean EC50 = 5.7 +/- 1.0 mu M) was, overall, more potent in vitro than chloroquine (No. EC50 = 214, mean EC50 = 16.1 +/- 9.0 mu M) (p = 1.3 x 10(-34)) and remdesivir (No. EC50 = 201, mean EC50 = 11.9 +/- 10.0 mu M) (p = 1.6 x 10(-13)). These results should be interpreted with caution regarding the potential use of ivermectin in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients: it is difficult to translate in vitro study results into actual clinical treatment in patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据