4.7 Article

Towards Machine Learning-Aided Lung Cancer Clinical Routines: Approaches and Open Challenges

期刊

JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jpm12030480

关键词

computer-aided decision; learning models; CT scan; lung cancer

资金

  1. National Funds through the Portuguese funding agency, FCT-Foundation for Science and Technology Portugal [LA/P/0063/2020, 2021.05767.BD]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [2021.05767.BD] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Advancements in computer-aided decision systems have brought significant benefits to healthcare, particularly in the field of lung cancer where accurate clinical procedures are crucial. This review focuses on the development of CAD tools using computed tomography images for lung cancer-related tasks and discusses current challenges and future directions in integrating artificial intelligence in healthcare.
Advancements in the development of computer-aided decision (CAD) systems for clinical routines provide unquestionable benefits in connecting human medical expertise with machine intelligence, to achieve better quality healthcare. Considering the large number of incidences and mortality numbers associated with lung cancer, there is a need for the most accurate clinical procedures; thus, the possibility of using artificial intelligence (AI) tools for decision support is becoming a closer reality. At any stage of the lung cancer clinical pathway, specific obstacles are identified and motivate the application of innovative AI solutions. This work provides a comprehensive review of the most recent research dedicated toward the development of CAD tools using computed tomography images for lung cancer-related tasks. We discuss the major challenges and provide critical perspectives on future directions. Although we focus on lung cancer in this review, we also provide a more clear definition of the path used to integrate AI in healthcare, emphasizing fundamental research points that are crucial for overcoming current barriers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据