4.7 Article

A meiotic switch in lysosome activity supports spermatocyte development in young flies but collapses with age

期刊

ISCIENCE
卷 25, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104382

关键词

-

资金

  1. LSU Office of Research & Economic Development
  2. LSU College of Science
  3. LSU Department of Biological Science
  4. National Institutes of Health [R00NS100988, R35GM138116]
  5. LSU Ron and Mary Neal Distinguished Graduate Student Fellowship
  6. LSU Department of Biological Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that lysosomes acidify in male germ cells during meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster. Inhibiting lysosomes in young-male testes causes E-cadherin accumulation and loss of germ-cell partitioning membranes. Age-related reduction in lysosome acidity may be one potential cause of spermatocyte abnormalities.
Gamete development ultimately influences animal fertility. Identifying mechanisms that direct gametogenesis, and how they deteriorate with age, may inform ways to combat infertility. Recently, we found that lysosomes acidify during oocyte maturation in Caenorhabditis elegans, suggesting that a meiotic switch in lysosome activity promotes female germ-cell health. Using Drosophila melanogaster, we report that lysosomes likewise acidify in male germ cells during meiosis. Inhibiting lysosomes in young-male testes causes E-cadherin accumulation and loss of germ-cell partitioning membranes. Notably, analogous changes occur naturally during aging; in older testes, a reduction in lysosome acidity precedes E-cadherin accumulation andmembrane dissolution, suggesting one potential cause of age-related spermatocyte abnormalities. Consistent with lysosomes governing the production of mature sperm, germ cells with homozygous-null mutations in lysosome-acidifying machinery fail to survive through meiosis. Thus, lysosome activation is entrained to meiotic progression in developing sperm, as in oocytes, and lysosomal dysfunction may instigate male reproductive aging.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据