4.7 Article

NanoLuc reporters identify COL4A5 nonsense mutations susceptible to drug-induced stop codon readthrough

期刊

ISCIENCE
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.103891

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01DK078314, R01DK128660]
  2. Children's Discovery Institute of Washington University
  3. St. Louis Children's Hospital [MIII-2019-796, CORE-2019-820]
  4. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [JP19H03379]
  5. JSPS Program for Advancing Strategic International Networks to Accelerate the Circulation of Talented Researchers [S2803]
  6. JSPS Program for Postdoctoral Fellowships for Research Abroad [CDX-008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Experimental results suggest that PTC readthrough therapy is a feasible approach for a fraction of patients with Alport syndrome, as readthrough drugs can facilitate the functional restoration of coding products from certain nonsense variants.
Alport syndrome, a disease of kidney, ear, and eye, is caused by pathogenic variants in the COL4A3 , COL4A4 , or COL4A5 genes encoding collagen a3a4a5(IV) of basement membranes. Collagen IV chains that are truncated due to nonsense variants/premature termination codons (PTCs) cannot assemble into heterotrimers or incorporate into basement membranes. To investigate the feasibility of PTC readthrough therapy for Alport syndrome, we utilized two NanoLuc reporters in transfected cells: full-length for monitoring translation, and a split version for assessing readthrough product function. Full-length assays of 49 COL4A5 nonsense variants identified eleven as susceptible to PTC readthrough using various readthrough drugs. In split-NanoLuc assays, the predicted missense alpha 5(IV) readthrough products of five nonsense mutations could heterotrimerize with alpha 3(IV) and alpha 4(IV). Readthrough was also observed in kidney cells from an engineered Col4a5 PTC mouse model. These results suggest that readthrough therapy is a feasible approach for a fraction of patients with Alport syndrome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据