4.7 Article

Tuning transport in graphene oxide membrane with single-site copper (II) cations

期刊

ISCIENCE
卷 25, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104044

关键词

-

资金

  1. Pritzker School ofMolecular Engineering
  2. AdvancedMaterials for Energy-Water-Systems (AMEWS) Center, an Energy Frontier Research Center - U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences
  3. DOE Office of Science [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  4. DOE Office of Science through the National Virtual Biotechnology Laboratory
  5. Coronavirus CARES Act

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Controlling ion transport through graphene oxide (GO) membranes is challenging, but the addition of single-site divalent cations can fine-tune the properties of the membrane. Cu2+ cations dominate the transport through the 2D channels of GO membranes, resulting in higher permeation rates compared to other cations. Cu-GO membranes also exhibit higher rejection rates in reverse osmosis tests, outperforming other membranes by 5%-10%.
Controlling the ion transport through graphene oxide (GO) membrane is challenging, particularly in the aqueous environment due to its strong swelling tendency. Fine-tuning the interlayer spacing and chemistry is critical to create highly selective membranes. We investigate the effect of single-site divalent cations in tuning GO membrane properties. Competitive ionic permeation test indicates that Cu2+ cations dominate the transport through the 2D channels of GO membrane over other cations (Mg2+/Ca2+/Co2+). Without/With the single-site M2+ modifications, pristine GO, Mg-GO, Ca-GO, and Cu-GO membranes show interlayer spacings of similar to 13.6, 15.6, 14.5, and 12.3 A degrees in wet state, respectively. The Cu-GO membrane shows a two-fold decrease of NaCl (1 M) permeation rate comparing to pristine GO, Mg-GO, and Ca-GO membranes. In reverse osmosis tests using 1000 ppm NaCl and Na2SO4 as feeds, Cu-GO membrane shows rejection of similar to 78% and similar to 94%, respectively, which are 5%-10% higher than its counterpart membranes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据