4.7 Article

Improved Working Temperature and Capacitive Energy Density of Biaxially Oriented Polypropylene Films with Alumina Coating Layers

期刊

ACS APPLIED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 5, 期 3, 页码 3119-3128

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.1c03735

关键词

capacitor; discharged energy density; working temperature; dielectric constant; composite fi lm

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFA0307900]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51790491, U21A2066, 52125204, 92163210, 51972296]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a method to enhance the working temperature of a polymer-based capacitor by depositing alumina layers onto biaxially oriented polypropylene films. The composite film shows improved dielectric properties, mechanical properties, and thermal conductivity, enabling high discharged energy density and stability over multiple cycles at high temperature.
High-temperature dielectric energy-storage properties are crucial for polymer-based capacitors for harsh environment applications. However, biaxially oriented polypropylene (BOPP), a state-of-the-art commercial capacitor dielectric, can work only below 105 degrees C. Here, we present a versatile method to enhance its working temperature by depositing alumina (Al2O3) layers onto BOPP films via magnetron sputtering. Compared with a pure BOPP film, the sandwiched Al2O3/BOPP/Al2O3 structure shows a higher dielectric constant, a lower electrical conduction loss, stronger mechanical properties, higher thermal conductivity, and especially increased working temperature. As a result, the composite film delivers a high discharged energy density of 0.45 J/cm3 under 200 MV/m (the actual operating electric field in hybrid electric vehicles) at 125 degrees C. The discharged energy density and energy-storage efficiency (similar to 97.7%) are highly stable over 5000 cycles at 125 degrees C. This work provides an effective route to develop high-temperature polymer-based capacitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据