4.7 Article

MOF-Derived Porous Fe3O4/RuO2-C Composite for Efficient Alkaline Overall Water Splitting

期刊

ACS APPLIED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 5, 期 5, 页码 6059-6069

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.2c00471

关键词

nanoparticle; porous; bifunctional electrocatalyst; water splitting; synergistic interaction

资金

  1. NISER
  2. Department of Atomic Energy (DAE), India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Researchers synthesized a porous and interfaces-rich Fe3O4/RuO2-C composite catalyst from Metal organic frameworks (MOF) material, showing excellent oxygen evolution and hydrogen evolution reaction activity and stability in alkaline media.
Development of highly active, durable, bifunctional electrocatalysts for overall water splitting is of great importance to enhance the use of hydrogen energy. Herein, we synthesize a porous and interfaces-rich Fe3O4/RuO2-C composite from the Metal organic frameworks (MOF) material for overall water splitting in alkaline media. The Fe3O4/RuO2-C catalyst showed superior oxygen evolution reaction (OER) with high faradic efficacy. It requires 268 mV overpotential to achieve the current density of 20 mA/cm(2). The catalyst also exhibited good hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) with a current density of 10 mA/cm(2) at an overpotential of 94 mV. The stability test confirmed a remarkable long-term OER and HER stability of this catalyst in alkaline media. In addition, the Fe3O4/RuO2-C catalyst was also used as cathode and anode material for overall water splitting. It showed superior activity and stability in alkaline media with 10 mA/cm(2) current density at 1.595 V cell potential. The excellent electrocatalytic activity of the Fe3O4/RuO2-C catalyst can be attributed to its porous structure, synergistic interaction between the components, the presence of hetero-interfaces, high electrochemical surface area etc. This work may provide an opportunity to design a bifunctional electrocatalyst for the development of anion exchange membrane water electrolyzers (AEMWEs).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据