4.8 Article

Stability and reactivity of copper oxo-clusters in ZSM-5 zeolite for selective methane oxidation to methanol

期刊

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
卷 338, 期 -, 页码 305-312

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2016.03.014

关键词

Methane; Methanol; Selective oxidation; Trinuclear clusters; Copper; Radical mechanism; Spin crossing; DFT; Zeolites; ZSM-5

资金

  1. EU NEXT-GTL
  2. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A periodic density functional theory study complemented by ab initio thermodynamic analysis was carried out to identify the active sites and mechanism of selective oxidation of methane to methanol in Cu/ZSM-5 catalysts. We systematically analyzed structure and stability of a wide range of potential extra-framework Cu complexes in ZSM-5 to address Cu speciation in realistic zeolite materials. We demonstrate that depending on the conditions of catalyst activation, binuclear [Cu(mu-O)Cu](2+) species and trinuclear oxygenated [Cu3(mu-O)(3)](2+) clusters can preferentially be stabilized in ZSM-5. The trinuclear Cu sites are the most stable extra -framework Cu species in Cu/ZSM-5 activated by calcination, whereas the formation of the binuclear complexes is favored under O-2-poor atmosphere. Although both types of Cu complexes contain extra -framework O-. radical species necessary for the homolytic C-H bond cleavage, the reaction paths for methane conversion that they provide are drastically different. Binuclear Cu sites react with CH4 stoichiometrically to yield methoxy groups strongly bound in the zeolite micropores. In contrast, the trinuclear [Cu-3(mu-O)(3)](2+) cluster favors the direct conversion of CH4 to CH3OH coordinated with the partially reduced Cu complex. These computational findings point to the trinuclear Cu-oxo clusters in ZSM-5 as the potential candidates for promotion of the low temperature direct conversion of CH4 to CH3OH. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据