4.6 Article

Lack of Functional Trehalase Activity in Candida parapsilosis Increases Susceptibility to Itraconazole

期刊

JOURNAL OF FUNGI
卷 8, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jof8040371

关键词

fluconazole; itraconazole; ROS; mitochondrial activity; trehalase; trehalose; Candida parapsilosis

资金

  1. Cespa, Servicios Publicos de Murcia, S.A. (Murcia, Spain)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Central metabolic pathways may have a significant impact on the virulence of pathogenic fungi. The deficiency in trehalase activity affects the susceptibility to azolic compounds and induces oxidative stress in Candida parapsilosis. The study highlights the potential of targeting trehalose metabolism as a therapeutic strategy against fungal infections.
Central metabolic pathways may play a major role in the virulence of pathogenic fungi. Here, we have investigated the susceptibility of a Candida parapsilosis mutant deficient in trehalase activity (atc1 Delta/ntc1 Delta strain) to the azolic compounds fluconazole and itraconazole. A time-course exposure to itraconazole but not fluconazole induced a significant degree of cell killing in mutant cells compared to the parental strain. Flow cytometry determinations indicated that itraconazole was able to induce a marked production of endogenous ROS together with a simultaneous increase in membrane potential, these effects being irrelevant after fluconazole addition. Furthermore, only itraconazole induced a significant synthesis of endogenous trehalose. The recorded impaired capacity of mutant cells to produce structured biofilms was further increased in the presence of both azoles, with itraconazole being more effective than fluconazole. Our results in the opportunistic pathogen yeast C. parapsilosis reinforce the study of trehalose metabolism as an attractive therapeutic target and allow extending the hypothesis that the generation of internal oxidative stress may be a component of the antifungal action exerted by the compounds currently available in medical practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据