4.6 Article

Taxonomic and Phylogenetic Characterizations Reveal Four New Species, Two New Asexual Morph Reports, and Six New Country Records of Bambusicolous Roussoella from China

期刊

JOURNAL OF FUNGI
卷 8, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jof8050532

关键词

bambusicolous ascomycetes; new records; new taxa; phylogeny; taxonomy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 31860620, 31760013, 31950410558]
  2. High-Level Talent Recruitment Plan of Yunnan Provinces
  3. Chiang Mai University, Thailand
  4. CAS President's International

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Four new species of bambusicolous ascomycetous fungi in the family Roussoellaceae were identified in Yunnan, China. Two species were found to have asexual morphs for the first time, and six known species were reported for the first time in China. Detailed descriptions and illustrations are provided for all new species.
During the ongoing investigation of bambusicolous ascomycetous fungi in Yunnan, China, 24 specimens belonging to the family Roussoellaceae were collected and identified based on morphological features and phylogenetic support. Maximum-likelihood (ML) analyses and Bayesian analyses were generated based on the combined data set of ITS, LSU, tef1, and rpb2 loci. The phylogenetic analyses revealed four novel lineages in Roussoella s. str.; thus, we introduced four new species viz., Roussoella multiloculate sp. nov., R. papillate sp. nov., R. sinensis sp. nov., and R. uniloculata sp. nov. Their morphological characters were compared with the known Roussoella taxa, which lack sequence data in the GenBank. Asexual morphs of R. kunmingensis and R. padinae were recorded from dead bamboo culms in China (from the natural substrates) for the first time. Neoroussoella bambusae, Roussoella japanensis, R. nitidula, R. padinae, R. scabrispora, and R. tuberculate were also reported as the first records from China. All new taxa are described and illustrated in detail. Plates are provided for new reports.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据