4.7 Review

Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptors: Evidence of Therapeutic Targets in Chronic Inflammatory Skin Diseases

期刊

BIOMEDICINES
卷 10, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10051087

关键词

aryl hydrocarbon receptor; CYP1A1; psoriasis; TCDD; 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [NRF-2022R1A2C2007739]
  2. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Republic of Korea [KCDC 2020-ER6714-00]
  3. Hallym University Research Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is crucial for the metabolism of xenobiotics and has been found to be associated with various diseases in different organs. Recent studies have shed light on its functions in chronic inflammatory skin diseases such as atopic dermatitis (AD) and psoriasis (PS), as well as its impact on the immune system of the skin. The therapeutic effects of AhR ligands have been demonstrated, but further research is needed to fully understand the roles of AhR in chronic inflammatory skin diseases.
The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), a ligand-dependent transcription factor, is important for xenobiotic metabolism and binds to various endogenous and exogenous ligands present in the skin. AhR is known to be associated with diseases in various organs; however, its functions in chronic inflammatory skin diseases, such as atopic dermatitis (AD) and psoriasis (PS), have recently been elucidated. Here, we discuss the molecular mechanisms of AhR related to chronic inflammatory skin diseases, such as AD and PS, and the mechanisms of action of AhR on the skin immune system. The importance of AhR molecular biological pathways, clinical features in animal models, and AhR ligands in skin diseases need to be investigated. In conclusion, the therapeutic effects of AhR ligands are demonstrated based on the relationship between AhR and skin diseases. Nevertheless, further studies are required to elucidate the detailed roles of AhR in chronic inflammatory skin diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据