4.7 Article

Clinical, Histopathologic, and Immunohistochemical Features of Patients with IgG/IgA Pemphigus

期刊

BIOMEDICINES
卷 10, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10051197

关键词

autoimmune bullous disease; pemphigus; IgG/IgA pemphigus; IL-8; MMP-9; immunohistochemistry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study retrospectively identified and characterized 22 patients with IgG/IgA pemphigus, a less well-defined and rarely reported form of blistering disease. The study found distinct clinical, histopathologic, and immunohistochemical features of IgG/IgA pemphigus compared to other forms of pemphigus.
Pemphigus is an autoantibody-mediated blistering disease. In addition to conventional pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus, several other types have been reported. Among them, IgG/IgA pemphigus is less well defined and seldom reported. To characterize the clinical, histopathologic, and immunohistochemical presentation of IgG/IgA pemphigus, we retrospectively identified 22 patients with the disease at a referral center in Taiwan. These patients showed two types of skin lesion: annular or arciform erythemas with blisters or erosions (45.5%) and discrete erosions or blisters such as those in conventional pemphigus (54.5%). Mucosal involvement was found in 40.9%. Histopathologic analysis identified acantholysis (77.3%) and intra-epidermal aggregates of neutrophils (40.9%) and eosinophils (31.8%). Direct immunofluorescence studies showed IgG/IgA (100%) and C3 (81.8%) depositions in the intercellular space of the epidermis. In immunohistochemical staining, patients with IgG/IgA pemphigus demonstrated significantly higher levels of epidermal expression of interleukin-8 and matrix metalloproteinase-9 than those with conventional pemphigus (p < 0.05). In conclusion, although IgG/IgA pemphigus is heterogeneous in presentation, it shows characteristic features that are different from other forms of pemphigus and should be considered a distinct type of pemphigus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据