4.7 Article

A simple methodology for predicting process-induced spring-in of curved composite parts

期刊

COMPOSITES COMMUNICATIONS
卷 32, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.coco.2022.101158

关键词

Polymer-matrix composites (PMCs); Cure behaviour; Residual; internal stress; Analytical modelling

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11902231]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WUT:203101002, WUT:203201006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A simple methodology for predicting the spring-in of curved composite parts is proposed in this paper, which only requires inputting the properties of constituent materials in rubbery and glassy states. The methodology includes the homogenization of lamina and laminate properties as well as the improved analytical calculation of spring-in for C-section and L-section composite parts. The results show that the methodology can accurately predict the properties and spring-in angles of composite parts.
A simple methodology for predicting spring-in of curved composite parts just inputting the properties of con-stituent materials in rubbery and glassy states is proposed here, which contains the homogenization of lamina and laminate properties as well as the improved analytical calculation of spring-in for C-section and L-section composite parts. To validate the methodology, the lamina and laminate properties as well as the spring-in of symmetrical AS4/8552 C-section composite parts with cross-ply layers and HexPly (R) M18/1 L-section composite parts with multiple orthotropic layers are predicted and compared with the available measured data as the illustrative cases. The results show that the calculated lamina and laminate properties match well with the available measured values, with a maximum difference of 14.6%. And the analytically predicted spring-in angles of C-section and L-section parts agree well with experimentally measured data, with difference of 11.1% and 6.9% respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据