4.8 Article

Atomic-scale insight into the structural effect of a supported Au catalyst based on a size-distribution analysis using Cs-STEM and morphological image-processing

期刊

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
卷 335, 期 -, 页码 24-35

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2015.11.021

关键词

Gold cluster; Cs-corrected STEM; Structural effect; Hydrogenation

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT), Japan [25820393]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25820393] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alumina-supported gold catalysts (Au/Al2O3) prepared under various conditions were observed on an atomic scale using aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy (Cs-STEM). The Au particles, including single Au atoms, on Cs-STEM images were extracted using morphological image processing, and the size distributions for reaction site candidates, such as the corner, edge, and surface of Au clusters, in a unit weight of Au/Al2O3 catalyst were calculated. Based on the size distributions for these reaction site candidates, we inspected the effective sites and sizes of Au catalysts for the hydrogenation of aldehydes (5-hydroxymethylfurfural and benzaldehyde) and a nitro compound (nitrobenzene). The results suggested that the corner atoms are a key site for the hydrogenation of aldehydes and the nitro compound because the dissociative adsorption of H-2 on corner atoms controls the reaction rate. Meanwhile, the effective size for the aldehydes was smaller than that for the nitro compound due to their different adsorption sites: while the aldehydes are adsorbed on the corners of Au clusters, the nitro group is adsorbed on their edges. The adsorption of the reactants was supported by reaction kinetics and X-ray absorption spectroscopy analyses. The specific active size for hydrogenation reactions was also investigated based on the size distributions. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据