4.5 Article

Magnetic properties of a capped kagome molecule with 60 quantum spins

期刊

SCIPOST PHYSICS
卷 12, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

SCIPOST FOUNDATION
DOI: 10.21468/SciPostPhys.12.5.143

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [KA3360/2-1, 497779765]
  2. 'Niedersachsisches Vorab' through the 'Quantum-and Nano-Metrology (QUANOMET)'
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [EXC 2056, 390715994]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigate the ground-state properties of the isotropic, antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model on the sodalite cage geometry. Our findings exhibit distinct behavior from known spherical molecules and highlight the challenges in methodology and the magnetic behavior under the presence of a finite magnetic field.
We compute ground-state properties of the isotropic, antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model on the sodalite cage geometry. This is a 60-spin spherical molecule with 24 vertex-sharing tetrahedra which can be regarded as a molecular analogue of a capped kagome lattice and which has been synthesized with high-spin rare-earth atoms. Here, we focus on the S = 1/2 case where quantum effects are strongest. We employ the SU(2)-symmetric density-matrix renormalization group (DMRG). We find a threefold degenerate ground state that breaks the spatial symmetry and that splits up the molecule into three large parts which are almost decoupled from each other. This stands in sharp contrast to the behaviour of most known spherical molecules. On a methodological level, the disconnection leads to glassy dynamics within the DMRG that cannot be targeted via standard techniques. In the presence of finite magnetic fields, we find broad magnetization plateaus at 4/5, 3/5, and 1/5 of the saturation, which one can understand in terms of localized magnons, singlets, and doublets which are again nearly decoupled from each other. At the saturation field, the zero-point entropy is S approximate to ln(182) approximate to 5.2 in units of the Boltzmann constant.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据