4.5 Article

Quantum minimal surfaces from quantum error correction

期刊

SCIPOST PHYSICS
卷 12, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

SCIPOST FOUNDATION
DOI: 10.21468/SciPostPhys.12.5.157

关键词

-

资金

  1. Simons foundation
  2. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-19-1-0360]
  3. UC Berkeley physics department
  4. Department of Energy via the GeoFlow consortium [DE-SC0019380]
  5. J. Robert Oppenheimer Visiting Professorship at the Institute for Advanced Study
  6. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0019380] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We demonstrate the equivalence between complementary state-specific reconstruction of logical operators and the existence of a quantum minimal surface prescription for physical entropies. We also introduce the concept of emergent bulk geometry for general quantum codes, and formalize a definition of bulk reconstruction called state-specific product unitary reconstruction.
We show that complementary state-specific reconstruction of logical (bulk) operators is equivalent to the existence of a quantum minimal surface prescription for physical (boundary) entropies. This significantly generalizes both sides of an equivalence previously shown by Harlow [1]; in particular, we do not require the entanglement wedge to be the same for all states in the code space. In developing this theorem, we construct an emergent bulk geometry for general quantum codes, defining areas associated to arbitrary logical subsystems, and argue that this definition is functionally unique. We also formalize a definition of bulk reconstruction that we call state-specific product unitary reconstruction. This definition captures the quantum error correction (QEC) properties present in holographic codes and has potential independent interest as a very broad generalization of QEC; it includes most traditional versions of QEC as special cases. Our results extend to approximate codes, and even to the non-isometric codes that seem to describe the interior of a black hole at late times.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据