4.7 Article

Furfurylammonium as a Spacer for Efficient 2D Ruddlesden-Popper Perovskite Solar Cells

期刊

SOLAR RRL
卷 6, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/solr.202200221

关键词

2D perovskites; ambient processing; energy conversion; furan; photovoltaic

资金

  1. Nature Science Foundation of Fujian Province [2021J01515]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province for Distinguished Young Scholars [2019J06023]
  3. Fujian Science & Technology Innovation Laboratory for Optoelectronic Information of China [2021ZR116]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

2D perovskites are promising materials for solar cells due to their stability and diversity. The organic spacer cation, 2-furfurylammonium (FuMA(+)), plays a crucial role in the stability and performance of 2D perovskites. Thin films of (FuMA)(2)(MA)(4)Pb5I16 were successfully synthesized with increased crystal size and enhanced orientation, leading to a significant improvement in the efficiency of 2D perovskite solar cells. Moreover, these perovskite films can be prepared in ambient air and show high power conversion efficiency (PCE) even at 30% relative humidity.
2D perovskites have recently emerged as promising materials for solar cells due to their appealing ambient stability and structural diversity. The organic spacer cation plays an important role in the stability and properties of the 2D perovskites. Herein, a new organic ammonium cation, 2-furfurylammonium (FuMA(+)), is developed as the spacer cation for 2D Ruddlesden-Popper perovskites. Thin films of (FuMA)(2)(MA)(4)Pb5I16 with increased crystal size and enhanced vertical orientation are obtained via an additive-assisted film forming technique, which dramatically improves the efficiency of 2D perovskite solar cells from 4.90% to 15.66%. Moreover, the perovskite films based on FuMA can be prepared in ambient air, and the devices based on the perovskite films prepared in ambient air with 30% relative humidity can perform a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 15.24%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据