4.8 Article

Clinical progress of nanomedicine-based RNA therapies

期刊

BIOACTIVE MATERIALS
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 203-213

出版社

KEAI PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.10.018

关键词

Nanoparticles; RNA therapy; Drug delivery; Nanomedicine; Clinical trials; COVID-19

资金

  1. University of Southern California, New Innovator Award (NIH) [DP2-DK121328]
  2. NSF EAGER from DMR BMAT [2132744]
  3. PKD Foundation postdoctoral fellowship [839636]
  4. WISE Major Support Award
  5. Division Of Materials Research
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [2132744] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The clinical application of nanoparticles (NPs) for RNA delivery has shown promising results in extending the half-life of therapeutic RNA molecules. This review discusses the NP formulations used in clinical practice and provides examples of RNA-NPs currently under evaluation for human use, as well as failed NP formulations.
The clinical application of nanoparticles (NPs) to deliver RNA for therapy has progressed rapidly since the FDA approval of Onpattro (R) in 2018 for the treatment of polyneuropathy associated with hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis. The emergency use authorization or approval and widespread global use of two mRNA-NP based vaccines developed by Moderna Therapeutics Inc. and Pfizer-BioNTech in 2021 has highlighted the trans-latability of NP technology for RNA delivery. Furthermore, in clinical trials, a wide variety of NP formulations have been found to extend the half-life of RNA molecules such as microRNA, small interfering RNA, and messenger RNA, with limited safety issues. In this review, we discuss the NP formulations that are already used in the clinic to deliver therapeutic RNA and highlight examples of RNA-NPs which are currently under evaluation for human use. We also detail NP formulations that failed to progress through clinical trials, in hopes of guiding future successful translation of nanomedicine-based RNA therapeutics into the clinic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据