4.8 Article

Probing lattice defects in crystalline battery cathode using hard X-ray nanoprobe with data-driven modeling

期刊

ENERGY STORAGE MATERIALS
卷 45, 期 -, 页码 647-655

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.12.019

关键词

Lattice defects; Crystalline battery cathode; Hard X-ray nanoprobe; Machine learning; Neural network

资金

  1. US Department of Energy
  2. Brookhaven National Laboratory [DE-AC02-76SF00515]
  3. Department of Energy, Laboratory Directed Research and Development program at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory [DE-AC02-76SF00515]
  4. [DE-SC0012704]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a unique combination of X-ray nanoprobe diffractive imaging and advanced machine learning techniques is used to reveal the lattice defects and grain boundaries in a single-crystalline lithium-ion battery cathode material. The results show the rearrangement of the grain boundaries and local crystallinity upon mild thermal annealing, providing valuable empirical guidance for defect-engineering strategies to improve the cathode materials.
Lattice defects, e.g., dislocations and grain boundaries, critically impact the properties of crystalline battery cathode materials. A longstanding challenge is to probe the meso -scale heterogeneity and evolution of lattice defects with sensitivity to atomic-scale details. Herein, we tackle this issue with a unique combination of X-ray nanoprobe diffractive imaging and advanced machine learning techniques. The domains with different lattice defect configuration within a single-crystalline LiCoO(2 )cathode particle are faithfully revealed using our approach. We further visualize the rearrangement of grain boundaries and local crystallinity upon mild thermal annealing. These results pave a direct way to the understanding of crystalline battery materials' response under external stimuli with high fidelity, which provides valuable empirical guidance to defect-engineering strategies for improving the cathode materials against aggressive battery operation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据