4.8 Article

Li+ concentration waves in a liquid electrolyte of Li-ion batteries with porous graphite-based electrodes

期刊

ENERGY STORAGE MATERIALS
卷 48, 期 -, 页码 475-486

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2022.03.037

关键词

Reaction distribution; Modeling; Four-electrode measurements; Li-ion batteries; Li+ concentration waves

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Specific Li+ concentration waves can occur in the electrolyte of graphite-based porous electrode/Li cells, which are influenced by both thermodynamics and kinetics.
Electrolyte solutions function as ionic conductors in Li-ion batteries and inevitably induce concentration gra-dients during battery operation. It is shown that in addition to these concentration gradients, very specific Li + concentration waves in the electrolyte are formed in graphite-based porous electrode/Li cells. This phenomenon has been investigated by both simulations and experiments. From the simulations, it has been concluded that the occurring Li + concentration waves in the electrolyte vary with position and time. Such waves originate from the fluctuations of the reaction distribution inside the porous electrode and depend on both the thermodynam-ics (open-circuit voltage, OCV) and kinetics (charge transfer reaction heterogeneity). Li + concentration waves occurring inside the separator region are directly related to the battery output voltage at low current applica-tions. A four-electrode device is used to validate the electrolyte concentration waves experimentally. The electric potential differences between the reference electrodes and counter electrode show regular fluctuations, demon-strating the existence of concentration waves in the electrolyte. The simultaneous appearance of the fluctuations in the potential differences and the transitions from plateaus to slopes in the battery output voltage illustrates the dependency of Li + concentration waves on the thermodynamics and kinetics of the electrochemical reactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据