4.6 Article

Ground-state destabilization by electrostatic repulsion is not a driving force in orotidine-5′-monophosphate decarboxylase catalysis

期刊

NATURE CATALYSIS
卷 5, 期 4, 页码 332-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41929-022-00771-w

关键词

-

资金

  1. Max-Planck Society
  2. DFG

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents crystallographic snapshots of human OMPDC in complex with substrate, analogues, transition-state analogues, and products, revealing that substrate carboxylate is protonated and forms a favorable low-barrier hydrogen bond with a negatively charged residue. The catalytic prowess of OMPDC primarily results from the transition-state stabilization by electrostatic interactions of the enzyme with charges spread over the substrate. These findings have relevance for the design of (de)carboxylase catalysts.
The origins of enzyme catalysis have been attributed to both transition-state stabilization as well as ground-state destabilization of the substrate. For the latter paradigm, the enzyme orotidine-5'-monophosphate decarboxylase (OMPDC) serves as a reference system as it contains a negatively charged residue at the active site that is thought to facilitate catalysis by exerting an electrostatic stress on the substrate carboxylate leaving group. Snapshots of how the substrate binds to the active site and interacts with the negative charge have remained elusive. Here we present crystallographic snapshots of human OMPDC in complex with the substrate, substrate analogues, transition-state analogues and product that defy the proposed ground-state destabilization by revealing that the substrate carboxylate is protonated and forms a favourable low-barrier hydrogen bond with a negatively charged residue. The catalytic prowess of OMPDC almost entirely results from the transition-state stabilization by electrostatic interactions of the enzyme with charges spread over the substrate. Our findings bear relevance for the design of (de)carboxylase catalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据