4.6 Article

Evidence of substrate binding and product release via belt-sulfur mobilization of the nitrogenase cofactor

期刊

NATURE CATALYSIS
卷 5, 期 5, 页码 443-454

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41929-022-00782-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH-NIGMS [GM141046]
  2. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-76SF00515]
  3. US Department of Energy, Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  4. National Institutes of Health, National Institutes of General Medical Sciences [P30GM133894]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides direct evidence that N2 is captured on the M-cluster via electron and sulfur depletion, and the N2-captured state is catalytically active in generating NH3. The study also reveals the conditions for product release and the dynamic changes of belt-sulfurs during catalysis. These findings highlight the crucial role of the mobilization of cofactor belt-sulfurs in the nitrogenase reaction.
Molybdenum nitrogenase catalyses the ambient reduction of N-2 to NH3 at the M-cluster, a complex cofactor that comprises two metal-sulfur partial cubanes ligated by an interstitial carbide and three belt-sulfurs. A recent crystallographic study suggests binding of N-2 via displacement of the belt-sulfur(s) of the M-cluster upon turnover. However, direct proof of N-2 binding and belt-sulfur mobilization during catalysis remains elusive. Here we show that N-2 is captured on the M-cluster via electron and sulfur depletion, and that the N-2-captured state is catalytically competent in generating NH3. Moreover, we demonstrate that product release occurs only when sulfite is supplied along with a reductant, that sulfite is inserted as sulfide into the belt-sulfur-displaced positions and that there is a dynamic in-and-out of belt-sulfurs during catalysis. Together, these results establish the mobilization of cofactor belt-sulfurs as a crucial, yet overlooked, mechanistic element of the nitrogenase reaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据