4.7 Article

Driver Response Time and Age Impact on the Reaction Time of Drivers: A Driving Simulator Study among Professional-Truck Drivers

期刊

MATHEMATICS
卷 10, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/math10091489

关键词

reaction time; driver distraction; road freight transportation; driving simulator

资金

  1. European Regional Development Fund [ITMS 313011V334]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to verify the average reaction time of professional drivers and investigate the impact of age on drivers' response time. Two experiments were conducted using a simulator and eye-tracking technology, with a total of 120 professional drivers participating. The findings provide practical insights for professional drivers and are valuable for traffic planning and modeling.
Drivers' response time means that drivers act after a judgment is made when an emergency action signal is needed. Drivers have different feelings while driving, and the response time to sudden situations differs. The main purpose of this study was to verify whether the mean reaction time of professional drivers is at the level of one second, which is the value usually used for practical purposes, and to verify the impact of age on the reaction times of drivers. Two different studies with a total of 120 participants-professional drivers-were conducted on the simulator, with 116 drivers participating in the first experiment and four drivers participating in the second experiment using eye-tracking technology. The determination of the mean reaction time was realized using statistical tests. The evaluation of the impact of age on the reaction time of professional drivers was carried out using statistical testing, a regression model, and clustering. The results of this study can be immediately used in practice for professional drivers, as the mean reaction time is usually used as a benchmark in several calculations in transport, for forensic and educational purposes, and for planning traffic and modelling different traffic situations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据