4.7 Article

Estimating Scattering Potentials in Inverse Problems with a Non-Causal Volterra Model

期刊

MATHEMATICS
卷 10, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/math10081257

关键词

inverse scattering; Volterra model; nonlinear systems

资金

  1. Hungarian OTKA fund [K138277]
  2. European Union [824093]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a finite memory, non-causal Volterra model is proposed to estimate the potential functions in various inverse quantum mechanical problems. The model capabilities are demonstrated through two simple examples, showing good match for a wide range of potential functions. The model also exhibits robustness to input perturbations and can be useful in situations where the precise governing equations are unknown.
In this paper, a finite memory, non-causal Volterra model is proposed to estimate the potential functions in various inverse quantum mechanical problems, where the bound or scattered wave functions are used as inputs of the Volterra system, while the potential is the desired output. Two simple examples are given to show the model capabilities, where in both cases, a really good match is achieved for a very wide range of potential functions. The first example is a simple one-dimensional bound state problem, where the wave function of the first bound state is used as input to determine the model potential. The second example is a one-dimensional scattering problem, where the scattered wave is used as the system input. In both cases, a higher order, non-causal description is needed to be able to give a good estimation to the solution of the inverse problem. The model sensitivity to input perturbations is also examined, showing that the Volterra representation is capable of giving a robust estimate to the underlying dynamical system. The model could be useful in real-life situations, where the scattering potential should be found from measured data, where the precise equations that govern the dynamics of the system are not known.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据