4.7 Article

Operator Calculus Approach to Comparison of Elasticity Models for Modelling of Masonry Structures

期刊

MATHEMATICS
卷 10, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/math10101670

关键词

quaternionic analysis; mathematical modelling; operator calculus; model comparison; masonry structures; elasticity theory; micropolar elasticity

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [LE 3955/4-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discusses the influence of different elasticity theories on modeling results and proposes a rigorous method for comparing different three-dimensional elasticity models, including describing the elasticity models, discussing spatial boundary value problems, and constructing representation formulae for solutions.
The solution of any engineering problem starts with a modelling process aimed at formulating a mathematical model, which must describe the problem under consideration with sufficient precision. Because of heterogeneity of modern engineering applications, mathematical modelling scatters nowadays from incredibly precise micro- and even nano-modelling of materials to macro-modelling, which is more appropriate for practical engineering computations. In the field of masonry structures, a macro-model of the material can be constructed based on various elasticity theories, such as classical elasticity, micropolar elasticity and Cosserat elasticity. Evidently, a different macro-behaviour is expected depending on the specific theory used in the background. Although there have been several theoretical studies of different elasticity theories in recent years, there is still a lack of understanding of how modelling assumptions of different elasticity theories influence the modelling results of masonry structures. Therefore, a rigorous approach to comparison of different three-dimensional elasticity models based on quaternionic operator calculus is proposed in this paper. In this way, three elasticity models are described and spatial boundary value problems for these models are discussed. In particular, explicit representation formulae for their solutions are constructed. After that, by using these representation formulae, explicit estimates for the solutions obtained by different elasticity theories are obtained. Finally, several numerical examples are presented, which indicate a practical difference in the solutions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据