4.7 Article

Development of Numerical Modelling Techniques for Composite Cylindrical Structures under External Pressure

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jmse10040466

关键词

composite; cylindrical structure; non-linear finite element analysis; effective engineering constants; collapse strength

资金

  1. Pukyong National University Research Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the collapse behavior of submarine hulls under hydrostatic pressure loads and proposes a computational modeling approach. The accuracy of the numerical model is validated by comparing with experimental data. The effects of different material models and ply sequence parameters on collapse strength are examined, and the applicability of existing design codes is evaluated.
Submarine hulls are pressure vessels for which excellent structural integrity under underwater pressure loads is essential. The use of light-weight materials contributes to reduced fuel consumption, improved speed, and increased payload while strength properties are retained. The focus of this paper is on the collapse behavior of a filament-wound cylindrical structure that serves as the main hull of a submarine subject to hydrostatic pressure loads. This paper presents a computational modelling approach for the prediction of the collapse behavior mechanism using a commercial finite element (FE) solver. The collapse strength obtained from the numerical model corresponded closely to available experimental data. The composite and aluminum material models were compared and the effects of stacking angle and thickness portion in the ply sequence on collapse strength were investigated. The advantages and disadvantages of available design codes (i.e., American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) BPVC-X and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) SP-8007) were reviewed by direct comparison with numerical results. It is concluded that the application of effective engineering constants for the prediction of the collapse pressure of submarine hulls may be feasible.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据