4.6 Article

Styrene-free synthesis and curing behavior of vinyl ester resin films for hot-melt prepreg process

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY COMMUNICATIONS
卷 30, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103143

关键词

Vinyl ester; Carbon fibers; Hot-melt prepreg; Curing kinetics

资金

  1. Materials/Components Technology Development Program of MOTIE/KEIT [20010565]
  2. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (Republic of Korea)
  3. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20010565] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, VE resin films without a reactive diluent were developed via esterification, and CF prepregs were fabricated using a hot-melt impregnation process. The resulting CF-reinforced composites exhibited good mechanical properties after manual layup and autoclave curing.
Vinyl ester (VE) resin films were developed from epoxy resins via esterification with methacrylic acid without a reactive diluent to fabricate carbon fiber (CF) prepregs via a hot-melt impregnation process. The viscosity of VE resins suitable for the hot-melt prepreg method was optimized by mixing two different bisphenol-A epoxy precursors, with low and high molar masses. Unidirectional CF prepregs were fabricated via the hot-melt impregnation method using as-prepared VE films. Manual layup of as-prepared VE prepregs with subsequent curing in an autoclave led to the successful fabrication of CF-reinforced composites with good tensile and flexural strength. The kinetics and mechanism of the radical crosslinking of VE synthesized using various mixing ratios of two different epoxy precursors were studied using nonisothermal differential scanning calorimetry. Quantitative analyses with the autocatalytic model and model-free methods indicated that the higher viscosity of VE causes a higher energy barrier associated with molecular mobility and diffusion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据