4.6 Article

Sensing mechanism of acetone adsorption on charged ZnO and ZnSe surfaces: Insights from DFT calculations

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY COMMUNICATIONS
卷 31, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103238

关键词

DFT; Charge-controlled; ZnSe/ZnO; Acetone sensing; Adsorption energy

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2020QE054, ZR2019MEM009]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52004318]
  3. Taishan Scholar Foundation [ts20130929]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the sensing mechanism of acetone adsorption on charged II-VI semiconductors was investigated through theoretical calculations. The results showed that surface charge states have significant effects on acetone sensing, with negative charge enhancing sensing on ZnSe surface and both positive and negative charges enhancing sensing on ZnO surface. The appropriate charge states are crucial for fast recovery.
Acetone sensing is meaningful for human health, food safety and animal safety. In this work, the sensing mechanism of acetone adsorption on charged II-VI semiconductor (ZnO and ZnSe) is systematically investigated by density functional theoretical calculations. It is found that compared with charged ZnO surfaces, charged ZnSe surfaces possess stronger acetone adsorption strength. Both positive and negative surface charges could enhance acetone sensing of ZnO surface while only negative surface charges could enhance acetone sensing on ZnSe surface. The appropriate charge states of ZnO or ZnSe are of significance to realize fast recovery. Because acetone desorption process could be endothermic with added energy under some charge states. Additionally, the acetone selectivity of sensing surface could be controlled by surface charge states. Moreover, acetone sensing could be effectively improved by the synergistic effect of surface charge states and ZnSe/ZnO heterostructures. Our results extend the knowledge into the acetone sensing mechanisms induced by surface charge states.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据