4.6 Article

Machine learning-based inverse design of auxetic metamaterial with zero Poisson's ratio

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY COMMUNICATIONS
卷 30, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103186

关键词

Auxetic metamaterials; Machine learning; Microstructure; Poisson's ratio

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [12072107]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a data-driven machine learning model that combines neural networks and genetic algorithms to achieve inverse design from property to microstructure, offering efficiency and accuracy in designing auxetic metamaterials with specific Poisson's ratio.
The inverse design from property to microstructure is more urgent in practical engineering than the regular design from microstructure to property. In this paper, a data-driven machine learning (ML) model based on the combination of artificial back-propagation neural network (BPNN) and genetic algorithm (GA) is developed for designing auxetic metamaterial with specific Poisson's ratio, i.e. zero Poisson's ratio. Different to topology optimization, the ML model can optimize auxetic metamaterials with higher computational efficiency, lower requirement of deep knowledge of mathematics and physical model. In the ML model, the data set prepared by solving a large number of regular design problems using finite element simulation are used to train the BPNN to establish the underlying mapping relationships from the microstructure parameters to the Poisson's ratio, and through which the GA optimization is conducted to globally seek optimal solution of the microstructure parameters related to the specific Poisson's ratio. The effectiveness of the ML model is demonstrated by comparing to the tensile experiment and the finite element simulation of the structure designed with the given prediction. The results show the ML-based method offers an efficient pathway to design the microstructure of auxetic metamaterials with arbitrary specific Poisson's ratio.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据