4.6 Review

Design Concept for a Future Super Proton-Proton Collider

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PHYSICS
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphy.2022.828878

关键词

proton-proton collider; physics beyond standard model; center-of-mass energy; luminosity; iron-based superconducting magnets

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11575214, 12035017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Following the discovery of the Higgs boson, the international high-energy community is considering and studying new large colliders, with the CEPC-SPPC project in China being one of the important research initiatives. Consisting of two stages, the project focuses on studying Higgs physics in the first stage and aims to become an energy frontier collider beyond the LHC in the second stage. This article presents the design concept of the SPPC and discusses key accelerator physics problems and technical issues.
Following the discovery of the Higgs boson at the LHC in 2012, new large colliders are being considered and studied by the international high-energy community to explore the Higgs boson in details and to probe new physics beyond the Standard Model. In China, a two-stage circular collider project, CEPC-SPPC was proposed and is under study. The first stage, CEPC (Circular Electron Positron Collier, a so-called Higgs factory) is focused on the Higgs physics, and the second stage, SPPC (Super Proton-Proton Collider) will be an energy frontier collider and a discovery machine beyond the LHC. The two colliders will share a same tunnel of 100 km in circumference, with a goal of 250 GeV in center-of-mass for CEPC and 75 TeV for SPPC Phase-I and 125-150 TeV for the SPPC ultimate goal. This article presents the design concept of the SPPC and some study results about the key accelerator physics problems and technical issues, which include luminosity optimization, beam collimation, beam-beam effects, longitudinal beam dynamics, high-field magnets and beam screen.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据