4.4 Article

A 3D Phase Space Analysis of Scalar Field Potentials

期刊

UNIVERSE
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/universe8030145

关键词

cosmology; scalar field; quintessence; dark energy; phase-space analysis

资金

  1. INFN grant InDark
  2. Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR) [L.232/2016]
  3. FundacAo para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT) [UIDB/04434/2020, UIDP/04434/2020, PTDC/FIS-OUT/29048/2017, CERN/FIS-PAR/0037/2019]
  4. personal FCT grant CosmoTests - Cosmological tests of gravity theories beyond General Relativity [CEECIND/00017/2018]
  5. FCT project BEYLA - BEYond LAmbda [PTDC/FIS-AST/0054/2021]
  6. [2018-23-HH.0]
  7. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/FIS-AST/0054/2021] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the phase-space analysis of Quintessence models with two potentials is presented. The models show new scaling solutions and attractor solutions, which are of interest for addressing the coincidence problem and cosmic acceleration.
In this study, we present the phase-space analysis of Quintessence models specified by the choice of two potentials, namely the Recliner potential and what we call the broken exponential-law potential, which is a new proposal. Using a dynamical system analysis we provide a systematic study of the cosmological evolution of the two models and their properties. We find new scaling solutions characterised by a constant ratio between the energy density of the scalar field and that of the matter component. These solutions are of high interest in light of the possibility to alleviate the coincidence problem. Additionally, the models also show attractor solutions. We finally construct concrete models built using a double potential according to which one potential realises the early-time scaling regime and the second one allows to exit this regime and to enter in the epoch of cosmic acceleration driven by a scalar-field dominated attractor point.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据