4.4 Review

Ultra-minimally invasive surgery in gynecological patients: a review of the literature

期刊

UPDATES IN SURGERY
卷 74, 期 3, 页码 843-855

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL
DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01248-y

关键词

Ultra-minimally invasive; Percutaneous approach; Minimally invasive surgery; Endoscopic surgery

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ultra-minimally invasive surgery (UMIS), including minilaparoscopic and percutaneous endoscopic surgery, has been widely used in gynecological surgeries. This literature review analyzed methodologically valid studies and found that UMIS approaches are feasible and safe for complex gynecological procedures.
In the last decade, Ultra-minimally invasive surgery (UMIS) including both minilaparoscopic (MH) and percutaneous (PH) endoscopic surgery achieved widespread use around the world. Despite UMIS has been reported as safe and feasible surgical procedure, most of the available data are drawn from retrospective studies, with a limited number of cases and heterogeneous surgical procedures included in the analysis. This literature review aimed to analyze the most methodologically valid studies concerning major gynecological surgeries performed in UMIS. A literature review was performed double blind from January to April 2021. The keywords 'minilaparoscopy'; 'ultra minimally invasive surgery'; '3 mm'; 'percutaneous'; and 'Hysterectomy' were selected in Pubmed, Medscape, Scopus, and Google scholar search engines. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed for the drafting of the systematic review. The systematic literature research provided 298 studies, of which 9 fell within the inclusion criteria. Two hundred ninety-six total patients were included, 148 for both PH and MH groups. Median age (48 years), BMI (24 kg/m(2)), OT (90 min), EBL (50 ml), time to discharge (1 day), self scar evaluation (10/10), and VAS (3/10) were reported. The most frequent intraoperative complication in both the PH and MH groups was surgical bleeding. The UMIS approaches were feasible and safe even for complex gynecological procedures. Operative times and complications were superimposable to the classical minimally invasive approaches reported in the literature. The reported results apply only to experienced surgeons.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据