4.6 Article

Automated Detection, Segmentation, and Classification of Pericardial Effusions on Chest CT Using a Deep Convolutional Neural Network

期刊

DIAGNOSTICS
卷 12, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12051045

关键词

pericardial effusion; computed tomography; X-ray; AI (Artificial Intelligence); hemopericardium; DCNN (deep convolutional neural network)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed an automatic PEF detection, segmentation, and classification tool that can reliably detect and diagnose PEF on CT scans with high sensitivity and specificity. The tool has the potential to improve the efficiency and quality of CT diagnosis.
Pericardial effusions (PEFs) are often missed on Computed Tomography (CT), which particularly affects the outcome of patients presenting with hemodynamic compromise. An automatic PEF detection, segmentation, and classification tool would expedite and improve CT based PEF diagnosis; 258 CTs with (206 with simple PEF, 52 with hemopericardium) and without PEF (each 134 with contrast, 124 non-enhanced) were identified using the radiology report (01/2016-01/2021). PEF were manually 3D-segmented. A deep convolutional neural network (nnU-Net) was trained on 316 cases and separately tested on the remaining 200 and 22 external post-mortem CTs. Inter-reader variability was tested on 40 CTs. PEF classification utilized the median Hounsfield unit from each prediction. The sensitivity and specificity for PEF detection was 97% (95% CI 91.48-99.38%) and 100.00% (95% CI 96.38-100.00%) and 89.74% and 83.61% for diagnosing hemopericardium (AUC 0.944, 95% CI 0.904-0.984). Model performance (Dice coefficient: 0.75 +/- 0.01) was non-inferior to inter-reader (0.69 +/- 0.02) and was unaffected by contrast administration nor alternative chest pathology (p > 0.05). External dataset testing yielded similar results. Our model reliably detects, segments, and classifies PEF on CT in a complex dataset, potentially serving as an alert tool whilst enhancing report quality. The model and corresponding datasets are publicly available.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据