4.6 Article

Breast Cancer Screening Based on Supervised Learning and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making

期刊

DIAGNOSTICS
卷 12, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12061326

关键词

benign; decision-making; machine learning; malignant; supervised learning

资金

  1. Madrid Government (Comunidad de Madrid-Spain)
  2. UC3M [EPUC3M13]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a new approach combining artificial intelligence and multi-criteria decision-making for a more robust evaluation of machine learning models for early detection of breast cancer. The Support Vector Machine is ranked as the most favorable model, indicating the effectiveness of the proposed method in decision-making.
On average, breast cancer kills one woman per minute. However, there are more reasons for optimism than ever before. When diagnosed early, patients with breast cancer have a better chance of survival. This study aims to employ a novel approach that combines artificial intelligence and a multi-criteria decision-making method for a more robust evaluation of machine learning models. The proposed machine learning techniques comprise various supervised learning algorithms, while the multi-criteria decision-making technique implemented includes the Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations. The Support Vector Machine, having achieved a net outranking flow of 0.1022, is ranked as the most favorable model for the early detection of breast cancer. The net outranking flow is the balance between the positive and negative outranking flows. This indicates that the higher the net flow, the better the alternative. K-nearest neighbor, logistic regression, and random forest classifier ranked second, third, and fourth, with net flows of 0.0316, -0.0032, and -0.0541, respectively. The least preferred alternative is the naive Bayes classifier with a net flow of -0.0766. The results obtained in this study indicate the use of the proposed method in making a desirable decision when selecting the most appropriate machine learning model. This gives the decision-maker the option of introducing new criteria into the decision-making process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据