4.6 Article

Accurate Tumor Subtype Detection with Raman Spectroscopy via Variational Autoencoder and Machine Learning

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 7, 期 12, 页码 10458-10468

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c07263

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81871401]
  2. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [19441905300, 21511102100]
  3. Shanghai Jiao Tong University [YG2019QNA28]
  4. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gynecologic Oncology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, Raman spectroscopy combined with the variational autoencoder (VAE) was used to analyze and classify tumor subtypes. The VAE successfully downscaled and reduced noise in the Raman spectra, leading to improved discrimination results compared to the original spectra.
Accurate diagnosis of cancer subtypes is a great guide for the development of surgical plans and prognosis in the clinic. Raman spectroscopy, combined with the machine learning algorithm, has been demonstrated to be a powerful tool for tumor identification. However, the analysis and classification of Raman spectra for biological samples with complex compositions are still challenges. In addition, the signal-to-noise ratio of the spectra also influences the accuracy of the classification. Herein, we applied the variational autoencoder (VAE) to Raman spectra for downscaling and noise reduction simultaneously. We validated the performance of the VAE algorithm at the cellular and tissue levels. VAE successfully downscaled high-dimensional Raman spectral data to two-dimensional (2D) data for three subtypes of non-small cell lung cancer cells and two subtypes of kidney cancer tissues. Gaussian naive bayes was applied to subtype discrimination with the 2D data after VAE encoding at both the cellular and tissue levels, significantly outperforming the discrimination results using original spectra. Therefore, the analysis of Raman spectroscopy based on VAE and machine learning has great potential for rapid diagnosis of tumor subtypes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据