4.6 Article

Nanocoral-like Polyaniline-Modified Graphene-Based Electrochemical Paper-Based Analytical Device for a Portable Electrochemical Sensor for Xylazine Detection

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 7, 期 15, 页码 13913-13924

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c00295

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, Malaysia [IF0618F1022]
  2. Universiti Sains Malaysia via the USM RUI grant [1001/PPSK/8012322]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A portable electrochemical device for xylazine detection was developed, integrating an electrochemical paper-based analytical device with a smartphone. The sensor showed excellent accuracy in detecting trace xylazine and has the potential for detecting other illicit drugs.
A portable electrochemical device for xylazine detection is presented for the first time. An electrochemical paper-based analytical device (ePAD) was integrated with a smartphone. The fabrication of the ePAD involved wax printing, low-tack transfer tape, and cutting and screen-printing techniques. Graphene ink was coated on the substrate and modified with nanocoral-like polyaniline, providing an electron transfer medium with a larger effective surface area that promoted charge transfer. The conductive ink on the ePAD presented a thickness of 25.0 +/- 0.9 mu m for an effective surface area of 0.374 cm(2). This sensor was then tested directly on xylazine using differential pulse voltammetry. Two linear responses were obtained: from 0.2 to 5 mu g mL(-1) and from 5 to 100 mu g mL(-1). The detection limit was 0.06 mu g mL(-1). Reproducibility was tested on 10 preparations. The relative standard deviation was less than 5%. The applicability of the sensor was evaluated with beverage samples spiked with trace xylazine. Recoveries ranged from 84 +/- 4 to 105 +/- 2%. The developed sensor demonstrated excellent accuracy in the detection of trace xylazine. It would be possible to develop the portable system to detect various illicit drugs to aid forensic investigations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据