4.6 Article

Gas/Liquid Pulsed Discharge Plasma in a Slug Flow Reactor under Pressurized Argon for Dye Decomposition

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 7, 期 15, 页码 12993-12999

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c00320

关键词

-

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP20H02515]
  2. JST SICORP [JPMJSC18H1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pulsed discharge plasma generated in a gas/liquid environment has attracted attention due to its low energy requirements and generation of highly reactive radical species. This study implemented a slug flow system to produce gas/liquid discharge plasma under pressurized argon, and investigated the effect of pressure on the system. The results showed that as the system pressure increased, the decomposition rate of methylene blue decreased and the concentration of total oxidation species increased.
Pulsed discharge plasma produced in a gas/liquid environment has attracted much attention because of its low energy requirement and the generation of various radical species with high reactivity. In our previous work, a slug flow system was developed to produce gas/liquid plasma under atmospheric pressure, generating continuous bubbles and stable gas-liquid interfaces. Currently, meaningful results have also been obtained in the field of plasma under high-pressure conditions. Therefore, in this study, a slug flow system using gas/liquid discharge plasma was implemented under pressurized argon. The system pressure was controlled from 0.1 (atmospheric pressure) to 0.4 MPa, and the effect of pressure on the system was investigated. This system was also applied to the decomposition of methylene blue. The chemical reactivity was studied, and the energy of the system was calculated. The results showed that as the system pressure increased, the decomposition rate of methylene blue decreased, while the concentration of the total oxidation species increased. This can be explained by a decrease in the energy available for methylene blue decomposition owing to the steady input energy and increasing energy loss.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据