4.6 Article

Corrosion Inhibition of Mild Steel in Hydrochloric Acid Environments Containing Sonneratia caseolaris Leaf Extract

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 7, 期 10, 页码 8874-8886

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c07237

关键词

-

资金

  1. Thu Dau Mot University [DT.21.1-024]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sonneratia caseolaris leaf extract was found to improve the corrosion resistance of steel in hydrochloric acid environments by forming a barrier layer through adsorption. The inhibition effectiveness was independent of the extract concentration and corrosive environment. The presence of electronegative functional groups in the extract promoted the adsorption process for the self-formation of the barrier layer.
Sonneratia caseolaris leaf extract was characterized for its mitigation of the electrochemical corrosion of steel in naturally aerated hydrochloric acid environments by electrochemical methods and surface analysis. The presence of S. caseolaris leaf extract (SCLE) in the hydrochloric acid medium ameliorated the corrosion resistance of steel via the adsorption of SCLE species to form a barrier layer. The improved inhibition effectiveness was demonstrated to be independent of the SCLE concentration and the corrosive environment. The highest inhibition performance of approximately 98% was reached for steel in a 1 M HCl medium containing 2500 ppm SCLE. The performance significantly decreased with a decrease in the HCl concentration from 1.00 to 0.01 M with the same SCLE concentration. In addition, severe corrosion occurred on the uninhibited steel surface but was significantly reduced on the inhibited steel surface. The analyzed results also indicated the existence of electronegative functional groups in SCLE, which could promote the adsorption process for the self-formation of the barrier layer on the steel surface. The work reported herein suggested a powerful strategy to mitigate electrochemical corrosion by adding an effective new inhibitor to achieve a green inhibitor system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据