4.7 Article

Antioxidants and Phytohormones Act in Coordination to Regulate Sage Response to Long Term Ozone Exposure

期刊

PLANTS-BASEL
卷 11, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants11070904

关键词

abscisic acid; aromatic herb; ascorbate-glutathione cycle; jasmonic acid; lipoic acid; oxidative stress; salicylic acid; Salvia officinalis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antioxidants and phytohormones play important roles in plant responses to abiotic stress. In Salvia officinalis, the accumulation of salicylic acid helps maintain cellular redox state and enhance defense responses during long-term ozone exposure.
Antioxidants and phytohormones are hallmarks of abiotic stress responses in plants. Although it is known that they can offer cell protection or accelerate programmed cell death (PCD) depending on the level of stress, the involvement of these metabolites in stress acclimation is still not fully elucidated. Here, we showed the role of antioxidants and phytohormones in Salvia officinalis tolerance to long-term ozone (O-3) exposure (120 ppb for 36 days, 5 h day(-1)). Salicylic acid (SA) content was increased under O-3 throughout the whole experiment (+150%, as average compared with control), being required to maintain the cellular redox state and potentiate defense responses. This accumulation was induced before the production of ethylene (ET), suggesting that ET was controlled by SA during O-3 exposure to modulate the magnitude of chlorosis formation and the cell redox balance (by regulating ascorbate and glutathione levels). The synthesis and/or regeneration of these antioxidants did not protect membranes from lipid peroxidation, as demonstrated by the accumulation of malondialdehyde (+23% as average). However, these processes of lipid oxidation did not include the synthesis of the membrane breakdown products, as confirmed by the unchanged values of jasmonic acid, thus indicating that this compound was not involved in the regulation of PCD strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据