4.7 Article

Allelopathy in Durum Wheat Landraces as Affected by Genotype and Plant Part

期刊

PLANTS-BASEL
卷 11, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants11081021

关键词

allelopathy; durum wheat; weed management; seed germination; polyphenols; flavonoids; Portulaca oleracea; Stellaria media

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that extracts from landraces of durum wheat have inhibitory effects on weed germination and growth. Among the tested landraces, 'Timilia' and 'Russello' exhibited the strongest phytotoxic effects, and extracts from the ears were the most active. Higher dilutions of the extracts also resulted in stronger phytotoxicity.
Durum wheat is one of the largest cultivated crops across Mediterranean areas. The high demand for sustainable crop productions, especially concerning weed management, is driving the return to local landraces. In the present work, the in vitro allelopathic effects of the extracts of three durum wheat landraces ('Timilia', 'Russello' and 'Perciasacchi') and a modern variety ('Mongibello'), obtained from three different plant parts (ears, stems and roots), were tested on seed germination (G) and mean germination time (MGT) of Portulaca oleracea L. and Stellaria. media (L.) Viii., two weeds commonly infesting wheat fields. In addition, the total polyphenol (TPC) and total flavonoid (TFC) content of extracts was determined. All extracts reduced G and increased MGT in both weeds compared to the control. The magnitude of phytotoxicity was strongly affected by the influence of genotype, plant part and extract dilution. Overall, the landraces 'Timilia' and 'Russello' showed the highest allelopathic effects, ear extracts were the most active, and the maximum extract dilution induced higher phytotoxicity. Extracts' TPC and TFC corroborated these results. The findings obtained here encourage the use of local landraces as a source of allelochemicals and suggest that they could be left on soil surface or soil-incorporated after harvest for a possible weed control.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据