4.5 Article

Intraspecific molecular variation among Androctonus crassicauda (Olivier, 1807) populations collected from different regions in saudi arabia

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jksus.2022.101998

关键词

Molecular phylogeny; Scorpiones; Phylogeography; COI; mtDNA; Ecogeographical regions

资金

  1. Deputyship for Research and Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia [UB-46-1442]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the genetic variation in seven populations of A. crassicauda from Saudi Arabia, revealing the presence of three distinct lineages and supporting the existence of two distinct populations, possibly indicating a putative different species. Further morphological studies may uncover undiscovered and cryptic species in the region.
Androctonus crassicauda is one of the medically important scorpion species occurring in the Middle East. In this study, molecular variation in mtDNA cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) gene within seven populations of A. crassicauda from four main ecological regions of Saudi Arabia was investigated. Scorpion specimens were collected from different eco-geographical regions. DNA was extracted, subsequently 700 bp fragments of COI gene were amplified using specific scorpion primers and sequenced. The obtained sequences were analyzed, and phylogenetic trees were constructed. The phylogenetic analysis showed high levels of genetic variation among A. crassicauda populations with the existence of three distinct lineages. Also, it supports the existence of two distinct populations of A. crassicauda in Saudi Arabia, which perhaps suggestive of a putative distinct species. Further morphological studies with additional specimens from the Arabian Peninsula may reveal possible undiscovered and cryptic species in the region.(c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据