4.7 Article

Traditional Cooking Methods Affect Color, Texture and Bioactive Nutrients of Undaria pinnatifida

期刊

FOODS
卷 11, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods11081078

关键词

U. pinnatifida; traditional cooking methods; quality characteristics; color; texture; bioactive nutrients

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFD-0902001]
  2. Key Science and Technology Program of Liaoning Province [2020JH1/10200001]
  3. Dalian Science and Technology Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars [2018RJ07]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the effects of traditional cooking methods on the color, texture, and bioactive nutrients of Undaria pinnatifida and found that blanching and boiling were the more suitable methods.
Undaria pinnatifida (U. pinnatifida) is an edible brown seaweed with high health value. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of traditional cooking methods (i.e., blanching, steaming, boiling and baking) on the color, texture and bioactive nutrients of U. pinnatifida, so as to screen out the traditional cooking methods more suitable for U. pinnatifida. In this study, methods of blanching and boiling resulted in better reduction in total color difference (0.91 +/- 0.58 and 0.79 +/- 0.34, respectively) and retention of chlorophyll A (62.99 +/- 1.27 mu g/g FW and 51.35 +/- 1.69 mu g/g FW), along with better elevation of fucoxanthin content (increased by 11.05% and 18.32%, respectively). Baking method got the best retention of total phenol content (1.62 +/- 0.11 mg GAE/g DW), followed by methods of boiling and blanching (1.51 +/- 0.07 mg GAE/g DW and 1.43 +/- 0.05 mg GAE/g DW). Among these cooking methods, blanching and boiling seemed to be the more suitable for U. pinnatifida compared to other methods. These results could help to determine the better cooking methods for U. pinnatifida products and provide a scientific and theoretical basis for improving human dietary health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据