4.7 Article

Organizational Food Environments: Advancing Their Conceptual Model

期刊

FOODS
卷 11, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods11070993

关键词

food environment; workplace; university; school; framework

资金

  1. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior-CAPES) [001]
  2. CAPES [88881.637476/2021-01]
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) [E-26/202.667/2018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed a conceptual model of organizational food environments, consisting of four components and 10 dimensions. The model offers innovative elements to understand and improve the organizational food environment, guiding assessment studies and interventions.
Understanding the complexity of the elements that constitute organizational food environments and their operating dynamics is essential to improving their healthiness. This study developed a conceptual model of organizational food environments. For this purpose, a comprehensive literature review was conducted, a first version of the conceptual model was prepared, a panel of experts was consulted, the model was improved, a second panel of experts was consulted, and the model was finalized. The model consists of four components (the institutional level, internal level of eating spaces, surroundings, and the decisional level) and 10 dimensions related to the institutional level and internal level of eating spaces (the availability, accessibility, affordability, quality, food and nutrition information, and promotion of foods, beverages, and culinary preparations and the availability, acceptability, convenience, ambience, and infrastructure of the eating space), as expressed in a graphical scheme. The conceptual model presented here offers innovative elements which contribute to understanding of the organizational food environment. It can guide the development of both assessment studies of food environments and interventions for their improvement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据