4.7 Article

Antibacterial Effects of Bacteriocin PLNC8 against Helicobacter pylori and Its Potential Mechanism of Action

期刊

FOODS
卷 11, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods11091235

关键词

PLNC8; H. pylori ZJC03; bacteriocin; action mechanism; in vitro

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LR22C200005, LZ21C200001]
  2. Major Science and Technology Projects of Zhejiang Province [2020C04002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the action mechanism of the bipeptide bacteriocin PLNC8 against H. pylori ZJC03 through its chemical synthesis. The results showed that PLNC8 significantly inhibited the growth of H. pylori ZJC03, reduced its enzyme activity and ATP level, and disrupted its structure. This provides a new avenue for the prevention and control of H. pylori infection and lays a theoretical foundation for further research on its regulatory mechanism.
Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a bacterium that can cause a variety of gastric diseases. Most bacteriocins have gained popularity due to their non-toxic effects on cells and antibacterial effects against a wide range of pathogenic bacteria. In this study, the chemical synthesis of the bipeptide bacteriocin PLNC8 was used to investigate its possible action mechanism against H. pylori ZJC03 in vitro. Results showed that PLNC8 had significant anti-H. pylori ZJC03 potential, which resulted in a significant reduction in urease activity and a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 80 mu M. PLNC8 inhibited the growth of H. pylori ZJC03, disrupting its structure as observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). In addition, PLNC8 decreased the ATP level and hydrogen peroxide sensitivity of H. pylori ZJC03. In conclusion, PLNC8 disrupts the ability of H. pylori ZJC03 to alter the host environment, providing a new avenue for the prevention and control of H. pylori infection, providing a theoretical foundation for further elucidation of its regulatory mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据