4.7 Article

Bioconversion of High-Calorie Potato Starch to Low-Calorie β-Glucan via 3D Printing Using Pleurotus eryngii Mycelia

期刊

FOODS
卷 11, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods11101443

关键词

bioconversion; Pleurotus eryngii mycelia; starch; 3D printing; beta-glucan

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31901795]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2021YFD1600403]
  3. Key R&D Program of Shaanxi, China [2021NY-157, 2022ZDLNY04-12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the role of Pleurotus eryngii mycelia in transforming high-calorie potato starch into low-calorie beta-glucan. Results showed that the 3D printing culture system promoted the bioconversion efficiency of mycelia, demonstrating high potential for preparing low-calorie food.
Edible fungi play an important role in material and energy cycling. This study explored the role of Pleurotus eryngii mycelia in the transformation of potato high-calorie starch to low-calorie beta-glucan. First, the 3D printing performance of the potato medium was optimized. After inoculating the fermentation broth of Pleurotus eryngii in 3D printing, we studied the microstructure and material composition of the product. Along with the increase in 3D printing filling ratio, the starch content of the culture product decreased from 84.18% to 60.35%, while the starch content in the solid medium prepared using the mold was 67.74%. The change in beta-glucan content in cultured products was opposite to that of starch, and the content of the culture product increased from 12.57% to 24.31%, while the beta-glucan content in the solid medium prepared using the mold was 22.17%. The amino acid composition and content of the 3D printing culture system and solid culture products prepared using the mold were similar. The 3D printing culture system promoted the bioconversion efficiency of mycelia. It also showed high application potential of Pleurotus eryngii mycelia for the preparation of low-calorie food.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据