4.7 Article

A dPCR Method for Quantitative Authentication of Wild Lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea) versus Cultivated American Cranberry (V. macrocarpon)

期刊

FOODS
卷 11, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods11101476

关键词

Vaccinium berries; chloroplast genome; digital PCR; authentication; quantification; DNA barcoding

资金

  1. European Regional Developmental Fund through Interreg Baltic Sea Region Programme (NovelBaltic project)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A DNA-based method using digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) was developed to identify and quantify wild lingonberry and cultivated American cranberry. The method is simple, fast, and sensitive, and can also be applied to authentication analyses of other plant species.
Berries of the genus Vaccinium are highly valued health-beneficial superfoods, which are commonly subjected to adulteration and mixed with each other, or with other common berry species. A quantitative DNA-based method utilizing a chip-based digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) technique was developed for identifying and quantifying wild lingonberry (V vitis-idaea) and cultivated American cranberry (V macrocarpon). The dPCR method with species-specific primers for mini-barcoding was designed based on the indel regions found in the trnI-CAU-trnL-CAA locus in the chloroplast genome. The designed primers were able to amplify only target species, enabling to distinguish the two closely related species with good sensitivity. Our results illustrated the ability of the method to identify lingonberry and American cranberry DNA using PCR without the need for probes or further sequencing. The dPCR method could also quantify the DNA copy number in mixed samples. Based on this study, the method provides a basis for a simple, fast, and sensitive quantitative authentication analysis of lingonberry and American cranberry by dPCR. Moreover, it can also provide a platform for authentication analyses of other plant species as well by utilizing the indel regions of chloroplast genomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据