4.7 Article

Simultaneous water reclamation and nutrient recovery of aquaculture wastewater using membrane distillation

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.102573

关键词

Nutrient recovery; Water management; Superhydrophobic; Membrane distillation; Liquid fertilizer

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Malaysia [1/2018 (LRGS/203/PJKIMIA/67215002)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used membrane distillation to purify water and recover nutrients from aquaculture wastewater. The membrane showed excellent anti-fouling properties and achieved high water contact angle and low contact angle hysteresis. The process demonstrated efficient water recovery and nutrient concentration.
A large amount of aquaculture wastewater with high load of nutrients, organic matter, and microalgae will pollute receiving water body and needs to treat before discharge. In this work, membrane distillation (MD) with the ability to avoid non-volatile substances was used to purify water and simultaneously recover nutrients from aquaculture wastewater. Results showed that micro-structures have evenly distributed on the surface of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane using nylon taffeta substrate. Resultant membrane has surpassed super hydrophobicity benchmark. It achieved high water contact angle of 153.3 degrees and low contact angle hysteresis of 8.4 degrees. The continuous separation and treatment of fish farm wastewater showed a small and steady flux reduction of 1.4 kg/m(2).h, indicating less fouling by the surface-printed membrane. In the batch process of feed concentration, the water recovery reached 86.3%. The retentate concentration of fish farm water is at least five times higher than initial concentration of ammonia (16.4 to 82.2 mg/L), phosphate (18.0 to 99.8 mg/L), and potassium (68.0 to 384.8 mg/L). This concentrated feed can use as primary nutrient of liquid fertilizer. In feed concentration process, except for ammonia (>86%), rejection of all selected inorganic substances is higher than 99%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据