4.7 Article

Application of nanocomposite polyelectrolytes for the removal of antibiotics as emerging pollutants in water

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.102582

关键词

Nanocomposite; Emerging contaminant; Antibiotics; Removal; Ciprofloxacin; Tetracycline; Amoxicillin

资金

  1. FONDECYT [1190469, 1171082]
  2. Vicerectorate for Research and Development of the University of Concepcion [2021-000-005P]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, nanocomposite polyelectrolytes were used to eliminate emerging contaminants in water. The effects of pH, ionic strength, and adsorbent dose on the removal process were investigated. The results showed that the adsorption kinetics and isotherm models described the process well.
In this work, nanocomposite polyelectrolytes (NCPs) based on alkylated chitosan macromonomers, ionic monomers, and 2D nanofillers of montmorillonite clay types were used to eliminate emerging contaminants, such as amoxicillin (AMX), tetracycline (TET), and ciprofloxacin (CIP), in water. For the removal studies, the effects of pH, ionic strength, amount of adsorbent, and kinetic and isothermic processes were studied. Removal percentages of 65.0, 81.4, and 76.7 were obtained at pH 9.0, 11.0, and 11.0 for CIP, TET, and AMX, respectively. It was also demonstrated that as the ionic strength increased, the elimination percentage decreased due to competition between sodium and chloride ions for the active sites on the adsorbent. Higher adsorption was obtained at an adsorbent dose of 0.03 g for CIP, AMX and 0.02 g for TET. The adsorption kinetics showed that both the pseudofirst-order model and pseudo-second-order model described the adsorption process, and the maximum adsorption capacity was at 30 min due to the availability of active sites present in the NCPs. Regarding the maximum retention adhesion capacity, the Langmuir isotherm was described as measuring values of 58.6, 291.7, and 97.6 mg g-1 for CIP, TET, and AMX at 298 K, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据